The
Innocent Sea
“It’s the end of the worl’,” he
says
in a whiskey-ed, Irish brogue.
A transplanted mick washed up
on an early Sixties’ California
coast.
Drunk, bitter, his failed life
set off to one side of a bar
stool.
But he sets us right to the place
of things,
and to the times: Vietnam’s
barely
more than a gleam in the eye;
skeptics are just beginning to
loosen
their ties; atoms are still
small,
and cars chug along like happy
behemoths.
(Blank cheques and ink are
everywhere!)
It is the end of the
world, though,
his world, his time—
even before he announces it.
But he can’t know it. Not really.
And we can’t know it, either.
(The decade is too young;
the air, clear and of itself.
The sea sparkles like frothing
champagne;
the sky is a Hollywood blue,
and the sun shines so
bright!
As bright as an old man’s pocket watch.)
And the story is told
of a man and a woman,
and their break with the past.
With eyes glazed in Now,
their wry smiles
betray their time to come.
For History lauds them on
to the world’s new day!
They’ve earned the right to
challenge;
youth is their gauntlet.
And this is as it should be.
And then not quite.
Something else will greet them
instead.
...
And we see in the end,
the beginning:
The tiny, cloth-topped car
with four frail beings inside,
beings whose skulls
are as thin and indefensible
as eggshells.
We watch them drive away, wary,
perhaps for the first time,
perhaps for the first time,
across a landscape grown
decidedly more dangerous.
And it’s then we recall the hope
of return,
that, in-between lovebirds and
war-birds,
generations and time;
between the grit and pale
of continents and oceans,
of continents and oceans,
there lies, there must lie!
the innocent sea.
—on Hitchcock’s The
Birds
Of course, one of my
favourite movies is Hitchcock’s The Birds, and I wrote this after having
watched it on TV some years ago. For those who aren’t familiar with the movie (who are
you, anyway?), the story concerns a small town on the California coast that is
invaded by birds that for some unknown reason attack the inhabitants. The story centres around one family and their harrowing struggle for survival over a very
long weekend. Made in 1963, it seems prescient in its concerns over the
upending of the natural world. The movie suggests a world that has somehow
irrevocably changed, even at the end, after the attacks have subsided. It suggests
a new ‘restlessness’ and impatience in the natural world—impatience with us, presumably.
Hitchcock also explores
the complexities of family dynamics and interpersonal relationships within the
Brenner family and the community of Bodega Bay (a real town north of San Francisco). There
are the themes of family unity, discord and alienation that play out nicely
juxtaposed with the image of various bird species atypically uniting together
in common purpose against the town and its people. It’s a fantastic film and a
treat to watch. (And for the record, I do have a man-crush on Rod
Taylor. Please don’t judge me!)
I guess in my poem I was
focused on the environmental aspects of the movie—the 'unnaturalness' of nature,
with the strange attacks by the birds. Also, I thought of the early 1960s as a
time when there is a loss of innocence in the Western world, in particular with
the growing Cold War between the USSR and America, as well as the beginnings of
the Vietnam War and the insanity of the nuclear arms race. It is interesting
that Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring was published in 1962, a year before Hitchcock's movie debuts. Her book, on the
effects of DDT on the environment was seminal in stirring public
awareness to the dangers of indiscriminate use of pesticides in our modern
agricultural practices, and is
credited with launching the modern environmental movement. One fact she uncovered is the effect DDT has on bird’s eggshells—it causes them to weaken and thin, thus making
the embryo less viable. This image was in my mind as I watched the Brenner
family drive away from the threatening flocks of birds that roosted about their
home. Their tiny human skulls seemed so very vulnerable in their small, cloth-topped car.
Like eggshells.
Unless we start viewing
ourselves as part of the natural world and not its lords and masters, we
will become increasingly vulnerable to it because we will lose our
understanding of our place in it. We distance ourselves from nature at our
peril. To return to a time of innocence, as the poem suggests, is not to be naïve; rather, it means that we accept our place in
the scheme of things, with humility and grace.
I thought I would add
this link to an interesting post I just read, "Notes on Heartache and
Chaos", from James Howard Kunstler's ever-thoughtful blog, Clusterfuck
Nation. In it, he writes about nature and our place in it, and how we go
about our technologically-enhanced lives ignoring it at our peril. I especially
like his concluding lines: "It’s not so hard to meet heartache and chaos
in this world, and yet love and beauty still abide. Treasure them when you find
them. They explain everything."
HITCHCOCK
BASED HIS MOVIE ON THE short story of the same name by Daphne
DuMaurier, written in 1953.
Originally set on the Cornish coastline in England, this compact and stylish
horror story focuses on Nat Hocken, a rural farmworker, as he struggles to
protect his family against invading flocks of birds that have inundated his
small community. Nat is a keen observer of the landscape, and he notes, early in
the story, how the weather has quickly turned colder, and that birds of many
species seem restless as they gather in larger and larger numbers around his
coastal village. One evening, Nat is awoken by birds as they swoop down at his
window and seem to deliberately attack him as he fends them off. After the
birds try to get into his children’s bedroom window, Nat takes precautions and
boards up all the windows in his cottage. His actions are justified, as the
next day the bird attacks begin in earnest.
We see Nat doing everything he can to
prepare. He observes that the birds (of all kinds, but especially the gulls)
have some sort of schedule in their attacks that seems to be regulated by the
tides. Nat takes an opportunity in the lull to gather supplies and to further
fortify his home. He learns that many in his village have been killed, and that
the attacks are much more widespread.
Throughout England, according to the BBC's
“wireless” broadcasts, birds are attacking towns and cities. Citizens are urged
to stay inside. Nat’s neighbour earlier had speculated it was the “Russians”
who had “poisoned” the birds. Nat thought it might be the unnatural cold that
had come at the end of autumn, driving birds from other regions to seek food en
masse in the south.
But the reason for the attacks remains unclear.
Ominously, Nat begins to think that the
birds have developed intelligence based on “millions of years of
memory…stored in those little brains”, and that humanity was now at risk. When
the BBC fails to come back on the air at the regular hour, the story ends with Nat
and his family barricaded in their kitchen, listening to the sounds of the
birds scratching and pecking and smashing against the walls of their home.
Cheers
Cheers
No comments:
Post a Comment