Showing posts with label NUDITY. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NUDITY. Show all posts

Sunday, 11 November 2018

PEOPLE ARE FUNNY: SEXBOTS—THE FUTURE HAS ARRIVED, OR EARL GREY IS HOT (AND BOTHERED)



I caught the 2014 SiFi movie Ex Machina the other day on the tube, and my, oh my! that is one hot AI! Well, dream on, sir, I thought, you’ll be dead and buried long before technology overtakes the wet dreams of code warriors and your fellow net surfers alike. And then a recent article on the RT World News website reminded me that such things may be a lot closer than we imagined. Oh, to have the perfect woman (or man) that doesn’t spoil things by wanting to spoon afterwards! And, lo and behold— Sexbots! Be still my beating (human) heart! they're a step further down the path from those always-prone-to-deflating inflatables found in today’s sex shops, or the mail-order devices of my youth (ummm…perhaps that’s more information than need be shared), they are harbingers of the truly liberating—and fun!—tech innovations coming down the pipe in the next decade or so. I can hardly wait!
     We live in a world where human touch, from work and craft to physical intimacy has become passé and so Twentieth Century! I’m sure robot scientists will learn to mask the plastic and W-D 40 scents such creations still come with, along with developing smoother skin-like coverings and more natural body temperatures, with attention paid to the slightly warmer, ‘special’ parts which make things go a whole lot smoother. And with AI tech just around the corner, who’ll need Huxley’s “feelies” when we can go to the movies (if there are still movies to go to) with our main squeeze doll? And we won’t need anything like the crude Chatty Cathys with those “chatty rings” to pull and break. Soon we can choose our partners’ words and sighs and moans (or blissful silence!) from a convenient digital menu. Ah, serenity now! Nirvana! 
     Well, I could go on, but I want to go get my order in for the Beta models coming off the assembly line. Hey, what can go wrong? They come with a “satisfaction guaranteed or your money back” policy, don't they?

     The RT article cites the costs of a sexbot at around $11,000-$15,000. I wonder if that doesn't make economic sense? Over the course of a few decades, how much does it cost to keep a relationship going--financially cost? A heck of a lot more than 15 grand if divorce court statistics are any guide. I think investing in a sexbot now, might save you a pretty penny in the long run. Well, food for thought, anyway. (Gosh! If they'd only come with an instruction manual you can read! "Insert tab 'A' into slot 'B'." What the heck?)

Saturday, 9 June 2018

POEM: EXPLOSION




Explosion
Your lips taste like cordite
in my mouth.
Your scent burns my skin
like cleansing napalm.
In the end, the cords of your touch
will bind me like the wires
of a backpack bomb.




YEAH. THIS MIGHT BE A BIT TOO MUCH, graphics-wise*. I wrote this some years ago following a suicide bombing in an Indonesian restaurant where a number of people were murdered who had been silly enough to take their families out to dinner. Praise____________! [Insert the name of your god, progenitor, organization, team or blamer-in-chief here.]
Why I equated this horribly trendy bit of violence with sexuality is a question I will ask my psychiatrist. Seriously, the (and yet I can’t quite use the word senseless**) violence of terrorism that is on so many of our minds these days needed a response, some kind of counterpoise, some opposite grounded in the human body, in our guts, to throw back in the exploding faces of individuals who choose to follow such a dark path. Well, heck folks, sex is about the most powerful thing going on the planet when you think about it (volcanoes and plate tectonics notwithstanding). So along with the trillions of critters—micro-and-macroscopic—who get it on (sorry for the 1970s, chukka-chukka wow! reference), I thought, “hey, sex sounds good, and it's better than viscera-covered walls.” So this short, violent poem is my way of co-opting the death-affirming choices of suicide bombers. (Question: Where are their farm teams? Can we not send out recruiters and get a few to come over to our team? Perhaps they can be put to more productive work such as de-mining places like Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia, Cambodia, Laos, Angola and Bosnia-Herzegovina, to name a few. Perhaps they can blow themselves up AND clear a farmer’s field of pesky landmines at the same time; that’s a win-win in my book.
I'm sure I will have more to say on militarism, weapons manufacturing, nuclear arms, asymmetric warfare, etc. in later posts because these things just piss me off.
But for here and for now, the poem's image is of sex as dangerous, explosive, but the danger and volatility are life affirming. We have, in a sense, ‘bombs of life’ waiting to explode inside us. We’re born, we grow, we flower and then ‘explode’ in a rush of procreation and life. Sigh…
     Sex, from zygotes to zeitgeist, defines us and makes us who we are, whether we like it or not. Of course, sex can be used for the vilest purposes, but it's the fundamental urge we share with 99% of the lifeforms on this planet. I can’t help but think of it as good and wonderful. And we have the great privilege of adding beautiful things  to go along with it. Perhaps we’re not the only critters who get warm fuzzies when the object of their love comes into the room (or nest or cave.) If elephants can cry over their dead, I would guess they can also feel love. So there, ISIS! Sex AND love!
I sketched the image of the woman some years before I wrote the poem. The photo image of the “suicide bomber cam” I did shortly after the Indonesian bombing. Bombs and bombers are nothing new. They did it in Russia and England, and Europe in the late nineteenth century; Suffragettes planted bombs in London mail boxes during the early twentieth century; after WWII, Jewish nationalists blew up buildings in Jerusalem; and so on, and so on, and so on. Truly, there’s nothing new under the sun. Except what comes out of an explosion of love.  

Cheers, Jake.

*No, this is not an image grab from an actual suicide-bomber cam. And this is most definitely not an image from the restaurant in Indonesia that was blown to bits. I took the image from an online magazine and practiced my well-honed Photoshop skills on it, so please, no letters to the editor! 

UPDATE: I wrote this poem with its accompanying images a number of years ago when social media and IT were in their infancy. On March 15, 2019, in Christchurch, NZ , a white supremacist, anti-Islamist nutbar used a headcam to live-stream his butchery of some 50 people and scores wounded who where praying at their local mosques. I'm sure it's happened before this year, and will happen again that such depravity is videotaped and used to promote hatred and violence. Though I must admit that the sick bastard's use of a headcam while he walked around shooting men, women and children to death is a lot more exciting click bait and keeps viewers glued to their seats than the above bomber-cam idea of mine. Mine is a 'one-shot' deal, after all. After the bomb blast, the show is over. In Christchurch, he could keep streaming until he ran out of bullets. Media-savvy, that one! 

**In the sense that what they do ‘makes sense’ in this way: Terrorists fight in ways that we don’t fight (or at least we pretend we don’t, or we’ve forgotten). We have our  drones and missiles; they have backpack bombs and IEDs. It’s an example of asymmetric warfare, the kind we'll see more and more as the century progresses. Terrorism is non-denominational. It’s open-sourced and available to anyone with a grudge. Weren’t the American colonists of the Eighteenth Century, fighting for their freedom considered terrorists by their British overlords? And today? Mind you, I don’t think blowing up schools or whacking the heads off priests is a particularly good way to gain sympathy for ‘a home of our own’, but neither is dropping bombs from 20,000 feet. War is inherently chaotic, dirty and bloody, and without some kind of resolution, some agreement to at least reach a status quo of some sort, we’ll spiral down and down until all sides are either exhausted and destroyed, or else we'll fall into a heart of darkness where we end up collecting enemies’ skulls to decorate our front lawns. (Leon Rom, a French rubber trader and possibly the real-life ‘model’ for Joseph Conrad’s “Kurtz” in the 1899 novel, Heart of Darkness, and whom Conrad met on his travels in Africa, kept skulls of uppity Congolese natives staked around his trading post during the infamous, late nineteenth century colonial rule of the Belgian king, Leopold  II.) Nice!



The Assyrian king, Ashurbanipal, 2600 years ago, apparently enjoyed viewing the severed head of the Elamite king he'd recently defeated while relaxing after dinner. (It’s a little hard to see, but Ash is lying on his recliner sipping wine, and the king's severed head is in a fir tree towards the left of the relief.
My favourite is the relief of the impaled soldiers. They look quite decorative, don't they? Geeze! Those Assyrians were not to be messed with! It’s a good thing we don’t do stuff like that today.

Okay. It’s Ned Stark’s staked head from Game of Thrones. (Damn you Joffrey!) There’s more than enough real life butchery to go around, and I figured this would be a little more palatable to readers than grizzly depictions of ISIS executions or Mexican drug gang murders. (By the way, does anyone remember Rwanda?)  
 

Wednesday, 2 May 2018

CARTOONS AGAIN




THESE WERE DRAWN A FEW YEARS AGO. I often use a mechanical pen or a fine-tip black ball point pen, and haven’t doodled in a while. Now I’m thinking it’s time to get down and dirty again with some ink! OK! I'm looking at this here toon and cummon! Talk of getting off on the wrong foot in life! Are we done before we've even begun. Do I have such low expectations of the future?
Ooopsie! That’s the next cartoon. I think I should call this one:  "DOG PADDLE, DAMNIT!"
 The thick lines for  the toon sheets below come from a cluster of statues I once saw at the Toronto Exhibition grounds. I’m not sure if they’re still there, or been trucked away to a landfill to make room for a Starbucks. Anyway, one summer, I was part of a group of barely-employed university students who got this gig filling out ticket requests (into old fashioned paper envelopes, mind.) It was for…wait for it…the King Tut exhibit that was being held in Toronto later that fall; whatever year that was I can’t remember; Google it if you’re OCD and need to know.
     There was a small building we worked out of, mostly on our own as I recall, and in a nearby courtyard there were all these statues from Greek mythology—centaurs and nymphs and gods of all sorts. They were small, maybe three or four feet tall, and made of cement. You could sit on them if you wanted. The surface of the statues was rough and unpainted and they had strong, squat, thick appearances—almost like they had grown out of the earth or were boulders that happened to be in the shapes of mythological creatures. I drew a number of such figures based on the memory of those statues I saw that summer. The third toon has some further examples. I like the sculptural aspect to some of them. They’re not great art, but fun, and I like the ‘cheeky’ mood the gals generally are in. Oh, by the way, if you or any of your parents didn’t get the Tut tickets as requested, or the date/times were wrong, well we were mostly stoned during the time we worked there. Sorry about that. (And I was in love with a girl who was learning Mandarin, and who was as far above me as Aphrodite. (Sigh) So I drew these goddesses instead….

Cheers, Jake.