Showing posts with label 'uberism'. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 'uberism'. Show all posts

Saturday, 29 August 2020

RANT: AS I WENT 'A WALKING DOWN BY THE LAKE

 

THE OTHER DAY I WENT WALKING along the lakeshore. I hadn’t been down there in a while and I decided to take the new pathways and boardwalk they had put up earlier this year. There were boats and people about, sunbathers and swimmers, newly sod grass along the cement and tiled walkways with a couple of new footbridges arcing over creeks that flowed into the lake. It was quiet, orderly, with families and strollers, bicyclists and so on. The sun was out and the air was fresh. It was around four in the afternoon, and during that three kilometer walk, I saw three people being attended to by paramedics or police; three separate events, at three different places, during the course of a half-hour walk! I’d never seen that before. And these weren’t seniors having heart attacks or accident victims or whatever; these were young people collapsed by the path due to what looked like drugs or alcohol. Down, depressed, dirty and desperate, they’re like exhibits at a poorly-run zoo.  Of course I walk by thinking, like most everyone does, ‘Thank God that’s not me!’

"It's downhill from now on, baby!"
But where will they go? What opportunities, hopes, dreams, and visions for a future will they have? Good question. And I guess my point in mentioning all this is because this is just the beginning.

I was listening to a podcast, The KunstlerCast, on my headphones that day, and JHK (James Howard Kunstler) was interviewing the American economist Jack Rasmus. Toward the end of the interview, the economist discussed the trend toward financialization of economies in recent times (particularly the United States), and how wealth was being concentrated in the hands of fewer and fewer people; how more and more jobs are slated to be eliminated because it is more profitable, and because new technologies will make certain job categories redundant:  

 

JR: “…I think that’s why a lot of millennials are out in the street and really pissed-off, because they're indentured; they're trapped. But what’s coming is even worse; AI is going to eliminate even a lot of those contingent, low-paid jobs, simple decision-making jobs.”

JHK: “Who then will be the customers for the businesses that do this?”

JR: “Well, the customers are everybody else, except those people who are going to lose their jobs.”

JHK: “Well, that’s mostly or a large segment of everybody else.”

JR: “Yeah, at least half [of the workforce].”

JHK: “It doesn’t look like a good picture.”

JR: “No, it looks like we’re going to have more and more inequality. Those workers who are connected into this new development, this new technology are going to do okay….”

JHK: “But that doesn’t bode well for social order…”

JR: “No. No it doesn’t. They’re [government] going to have to come up with some way of giving half of the populace, particularly the young, you know the GenZrs and young Millennials, some hope…”

I don’t know if I agree that AI is going to be as widespread or viable as Rasmus predicts, but I do agree that young people need to see a light at the end of the tunnel, or quite frankly, they’ll start dynamiting the hell out of it! And who could blame them?

 

          Cheers, Jake

 


 

 

Friday, 30 August 2019

MOVIE REVIEW: EXECUTIVE SUITE

I WATCHED AN OLD MOVIE CALLED Executive Suite the other night and went on a full-bore nostalgia trip. The story is about a group of executives as they duke-it-out for control of a large, American corporation, following the sudden death of the company’s CEO. Avery Bullard—there’s a man’s name for you!—dies of a heart attack while away on business in New York. His is a character whose face we don’t see on screen. The opening scene is viewed through his eyes--like a first-person shooter, minus the guns and body count--as he completes a meeting on Wall Street, buys a newspaper, and then collapses to the pavement, dead. We learn he was a larger-than-life character, a captain of industry, beloved by employees, respected by his competitors, admired by all. Under his leadership, he turned around the fortunes of the family-owned Tredway Corporation, making it into the third largest furniture manufacturer in the United States. He bestrode the earth with great strides, and all who followed him did prosper.
Yet, after years of struggle and growth, cracks are seen in the façade. All is not well at Tredway. Through dialogue between various characters we learn there are forces afoot that threaten to change the character and direction of the company, to make it into something that would have made Avery Bullard ashamed. And these forces were loosed, in no small part, by the great man himself, who in recent years had come to tack his boat more often in the winds of a changing corporate sea, whose airs filled the sails of the great man’s ship and took him further and further away from his former course. Nautical imagery aside, the story is about the scheming of several Tredway executives as each attempts to garner enough votes before the hastily called board meeting to be named president.
Based on a 1954 novel by the same name, the movie could easily have been staged as a play, because much of the action takes place in the executive offices on the top floor of the company headquarters. By the way, the emperor Nero would have been jealous of that pad! Talk about plush! It had heavy wood-paneled walls, marbled floors, fireplaces, a gothic-styled entrance way you could play basketball in and even a bell tower that chimed on the hour! And the bells are heard throughout the movie. In the opening scenes we hear them chiming. At first, it is a welcoming sound, a sound of gathering and community. After Bullard’s death they sound ominous, discordant and funereal. As the various  factions battle, the ringing becomes strident, oppressive, foretelling of doom. At one point, board member George Caswell—a low-life Wall Street wolf whose goal is to capitalize, through insider trading, on Bullard’s death—claps his hands to his ears as the bells sound out the hour. (They are the sound of Ballard's ghost angrily denouncing Caswell's duplicity.)  But our hero, Don Walling, scarcely notices them. For him, they are the sound of the beating heart of his company. They sound for workers and executives alike, for their community and their workday lives. They ring out for the dead, and they will announce the arrival of new king. (I want a bell tower, too, but my landlord won't go for it!)
William Holden as Don Walling
Walling is the executive in charge of production who seeks to innovate and invigorate the company, and he is seen as the man of the future, the type of CEO that should be in charge. His protagonist is the oily bean-counter, Loren Shaw. (“Shaw”—everybody calls him “Shaw.” They say his name like they had something stuck in their throat.) He is like a spider who waits in his lair to trap others in his web. Yet, he perspires heavily, and compulsively washes his hands--almost as often as Pontius Pilate washes his hands of the blood of Christ--suggesting Shaw may have a conscience, after all. Nevertheless, he carries on with his plotting, and his behind-the-scenes manipulations and back-stabbing would give Machiavelli a run for his money! Will this technocrat and nickel-and-dimer win out, or will the soul of the company be kept alive by Walling. Will quality and honest brokerage win the day, or will Shaw’s flow charts and profit-margin mentality change Tredway into a place where the bottom line is put on the top shelf? Will the company be a place where innovative, quality furniture is made or will it become another Ikea? (I know, I know! A lot of people love Ikea. But, seriously—why?)
So the gist of the story is whether you can stay true to yourself, keep your core values, and run a giant company ethically. By the movie’s end, Walling, played by the affable, yet steely-eyed, William Holden, wins the day and accepts the torch handed down by Bullard’s ghost. The bells ring out. (That Bullard must have had enormous brass clappers!) The King is dead. Long live the king! The End. Fade to black. It was David versus Goliath, George Bailey versus Mr. Potter, Gary Cooper at High Noon. You get the picture. And in glorious black and white! No wonder I had a nostalgia high zapping me harder than the sugar rush I get from a plateful of Grandma’s homemade fudge!
Fredric March as "Shaw"
Wow! How times have changed. And it’s too easy; it’s like shooting ducks—or executives—in a barrel! In the real world now, fast-forward twenty years and then another thirty and who's won the battle? Not Don Walling*. His factories are all closed. All his workers are laid off or moved, or dead. Company towns like Millburugh, with their once bustling factories and plants, are now ghost-towns and places that have seen their heydays pass them by long ago. Production has moved to China or Vietnam, or places where rainforests are razed to the ground to make shitty, mass-produced furniture for Walmart. It all went pear-shaped, and then the bottom fell out. And so the “Shaws” of the world have won, after all: Sales margins and stock options, market share and shareholder dividends are the new mantras. It's quantity versus quality; global versus community; profit versus pride. 

The Board Room
And for some reason, that really annoying song, “It’s a Small World” comes to mind. Wik says the tune is played as part of “a water-based dark ride located in the Fantasy Land area at the various Walt Disney Parks,” and that it is the most “publically played” song of all time. (Egad! If you hear the thing just once it sticks in your brain like a trough of cold treacle!) And the idea of being forced to take a “dark ride” through a “Fantasy Land” while listening to how small everything has become over and over, and bloody over again, somehow seems an appropriate rite of passage for our times. And if Don Walling was around (and not under an overpass drinking hooch) he might agree with me.
Thus, neoliberal economic policies and rampant capitalism over the past forty years have taken us all for a ride, gutting manufacturing infrastructure and turning former makers of things into consumers of things (all atop a mountain of debt that can never be repaid.) Where will it end, and when, are questions I’ll leave for another day.
Finally, in the movie's climactic scene, Don Walling makes an impassioned plea to the board of directors, sharing his vision for the company:

“The force behind a great company has to be more than the pride of one man; it has to be the pride of thousands. You can't make men work for money alone - you starve their souls when you try it, and you can starve a company to death the same way.”

Isn’t he just adorable?

Cheers
"...peg A2 into hole B3? WTF!?!"


*I was looking to see if there was any of the uber-mensch in Walling—this movie reminded about another movie based on a book by the same name, The Fountainhead, by Ayn Rand, and it's protagonist, the brilliant architect Howard Roark—but I found Holden’s character to have a greater need to promote the collective well-being of his society versus the glacial individualism of someone like Roark (or for that matter, the highly competent and gifted, yet self-serving and avaricious "Shaw".) However, there was matter of the ‘vestal virgin’ figure of Bullard’s secretary, Miss Martin, that reminded me about how high the glass ceiling was back then when there were so many Randian swinging dicks coming into their own.
  
Executive Suite, 1954, directed by Robert Wise. Staring William Holden, June Allyson, Barbara Stanwyck, Fredric March and Walter Pidgeon, Shelley Winters)

Tuesday, 24 April 2018

RANTS: PEOPLE ARE FUNNY #2


RANDOM THOUGHTS AND OBSERVATIONS OF OUR CRAZY, QUIRKY WORLD
 
     OK. A baby nappy changing service. What will they think of next? Perhaps this is the latest thing, or perhaps I’m behind in my diaper news? But apparently the company childcare.co.uk, (which seems to be an actual British company) put out an April fool's joke announcing they were starting an ‘uber-wipes’ diaper changing service, but decided, due to huge numbers of "views" on their website, to create an actual service which will allow complete strangers to come into your home and change your child's diapers while you are busy being busy.
Yep, I'd want somebody I've never met and may never see again to come in and do the dirty work with my child. What could possibly go wrong?
Are we truly that busy and that brain dead, that we need an app service to wipe our babies' bottoms? So call "Nappy 999", for a change. Sigh…

Cheers, Jake