Fragments
Body bags rip open, spilling their bones.
Father Gillespie prays, clutching his jones.
Tattered flags are brought back, patched, from afar
like dead-letter days once wished on a star.
like dead-letter days once wished on a star.
Young Susie Salesclerk begins her last rounds.
(She’s just found Jesus in old coffee grounds.)
Singers in alleys, criers in the streets—
Choirs of churches dying for retreat.
Sands by a desert, water by a stream;
Patient by a window wakes from a dream:
Inland there's fever; fire's in the air.
Past the shoreline--icebergs--float by everywhere.
Babies in dumpsters, fallen like the leaves.
Truffles in wine sauce; champagne makes you sneeze.
And so, to sum up, here's our epitaph:
What's heard by the dead is summoned in their wrath.
What's heard by the dead is summoned in their wrath.
WELL, I READ THIS GOLDEN OLDIES AND DID SOME EDITING, and still I’m bummed out and
depressed. I guess the title has something to do with it. The word, "fragments"
doesn't suggest a warm, kumbyya
around a campfire, does it? And the poem is
fragmentary in the images presented: a priest examining the bodies of soldiers
returned from war; a salesclerk’s religious conversion; drunks singing in streets (though the line could have other interpretations, I guess); half-empty churches; a patient waking up to a new
reality; environmental disaster, aborted babies, decadent rich—in other words, business-as-usual. The images would fit nicely in my “News of
the World” poems, with snippets of this and clippings of that, with things that stab
and slash, or at least prick and cut (or paper-cut) us; those things we do and see every day.
The
priest (another priest!) looking at bodies spilling out of body bags, having to clutch at his bible or rosary, or anything to keep his
faith going, I thought was a fairly powerful image, suggesting the ‘centre
no longer holds’ (it’s spilling out). It contrasts with the new-found
faith Susie discovers in pile of coffee grounds.
I like
the image of a patient looking out of their hospital window and seeing fires
raging across the horizon, and icebergs melting in the harbour. Was the patient sick because their
world is sick?
In the next stanza, the image of the most precious of life—newborns—discarded like garbage juxtaposed with truffles, a ghastly over-priced fungus being served at dinner. Skewed moral values are on full display. The poem ends with the dead's "final
wrath". Their wrath is their decay, the
evidence that all our works and days will eventually be for naught. All our
doings—the good, bad and the ugly—will be swept away someday by Death, the great leveler of saints, sinners and everyone in between.
Whatever we imagine for our epitaphs will not matter. All the comforting
words and images of ourselves that we hide behind will be exposed as futile.
Thus, the fragments of our lives are all that we have. In between them, and what comes after them, is nothing. So it behooves us to make each piece--no matter how small and insignificant--as polished and shining as we can. Jeeze! No wonder this poem bums me out!
So, what to do, what to do…?
Thus, the fragments of our lives are all that we have. In between them, and what comes after them, is nothing. So it behooves us to make each piece--no matter how small and insignificant--as polished and shining as we can. Jeeze! No wonder this poem bums me out!
So, what to do, what to do…?
Well: Live
each day as if it were your last. Love, instead of hate. Drop one less baby in the garbage. And war? How about nappies instead of napalm.
Prayers instead of wishes. Compost heaps instead of carte blanche. Do's instead of done's. Hymns instead of hums. The list could be considerable.
Feel free to add to it.