Friday, 17 July 2020

RANT: THE REAL NEED FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION



I have to hurry a bit today. I have to set out mousetraps again. There is a mouse in my house and during the day! Oh! The horror!

"Hey! Devos! Stop poping my balloon!"
I watched an interesting interview on The View the other day with American PhD student Irami Osei-Frimpong, host of The Funky Academic YouTube channel. He discussed the state of American education and the potential for public education to be further degraded post-Covid-19.

Because America has a more centralized federation than Canada, its education system is run by a federal department located in Washington D.C., with its current head Nancy Devos. Devos is a billionaire Republican whose programmes have come under much criticism since she took office as Secretary of Education in the Trump administration in 2017. Her policies emphasize defunding of public schools in favour of charter schools and “vouchers” so parents can have more ‘choice’ where to send their children to be educated. As an example, her reorienting of Detroit’s schools following that city’s financial collapse and bankruptcy some years ago resulted in a fragmented and dysfunctional system that fails to serve the needs of students and their communities. Detroit is listed near the bottom of the nation in terms of test-scores and graduation numbers. “Motor City” has had a long ride down and Devos has done little to slow its slide.
Irami is concerned that schools be opened as soon as possible and one ‘work-around’ he suggests in this era of Covid-19 is to use other public spaces, buildings, offices etc. that currently are vacant as temporary classrooms—keeping children safe by having smaller classes using social-distancing practices. That’s one idea that’s helpful.
He then discusses why “public” education is so important. He says that the focus of education shouldn’t be what your child--as an individual--learns, so much as what those “around” your child learn. Irami uses the game of pick-up basketball as an example. Basketball is a game played by a set of rules that everyone knows. The rules are there to guide all the players and to make the game fair—everybody abides by the rules and it’s game-on! There are, of course, penalties for rule-breakers.
But what if a privileged child is coached privately and learns all the rules (say, like a private-school/charter-school child learns the rules of their society), while the rest are not taught the rules (say, like defunded, demoralized public-school children)? Then the privileged player can call a foul any time he or she wants for anything and have an advantage over the rest of the players, who are clueless about the rules. That’s not fair!
Irami suggests that an educated public*, who know the rules and how the game is played, are a threat to elites who do not want people to understand history and politics, economics and so on. To them, ignorance (for the masses) is bliss.  When people are educated and learn about their rights and responsibilities as citizens, then they are free to criticize and demand equality and fair play in how their society functions. And that’s not something billionaires like Devos would like to see happen.
PhDuh candidate.
Hence, Irami suggests that in order for there to be a safer, fairer and more open society for you to live in—as an individual citizen—it is necessary for those around you to be equally educated in the ‘rules of the game’. Devos and her ilk would have only their team in the know.
Food for thought.

Cheers, Jake

P.S. There is no need for complacency around Canadian education, which is a provincial responsibility. What happens south of the border is mirrored up here, just not to the same extent. Yet.

"Oh! I most certainly, certainly agree!"


 
*Why does the movie Idiocracy come to mind?  

Wednesday, 15 July 2020

RANT: WHERE HAVE ALL THE CITIES GONE?



TD Towers, Toronto
I was listening to an interesting podcast the other day as I went walking in my favourite park (of course abiding by strict guidelines for social distancing and all other forms of social intercourse). Jim Kunstler (JHK) was interviewing Ann Sussman, a registered architect in the United States, who is currently studying neurobiology for her doctorate. She’d written a book called Cognitive Architecture, Designing for How We Respond to the Built Environment (Routledge, 2015), and has a new book coming out—Urban Experience & Design: Contemporary Perspectives on Improving the Public Realm, (Routledge 2020). JHK spoke to her about her findings. One of her main talking points is that the built environment around us both shapes and informs our brains, and certain shapes, city plans, streetscapes and so on are more beneficial to our neurological health than others. She suggests we intuitively know this and that, given our druthers, we would rather live in towns and cities that support and enhance our brain’s functioning than not.
Provincial Courts (or bunker?) Brantford, Ontario
She says that many types of buildings and city designs today are antithetical to the well-being of our neurology, and that we have much to learn from the architecture of other times and cultures. Unhealthy cities breed unhealthy people.
Interestingly, she also says: “Hurt people hurt people.” She goes on to describe the history of modern architecture that began in the early 1900s, and suggests that several of its chief proponents were themselves neurologically damaged, and their damaged neurology, in turn, can be seen in the type of buildings they made.
1970's York University, Toronto (or gulag?)
Today we are familiar with the ‘glass box’ skyscrapers and the miserable legacy of public buildings using concrete as a main facing element, particularly the “Brutalist School” of architecture. These types of buildings (and there are many other examples of ‘sick’ buildings) are out of scale and proportion, and have shapes and cladding that rebuff human interaction with them. Some public and commercial buildings even repel us from wanting to go inside. (Even before the coronavirus, how many of us truly wanted to spend any time at a WalMart?)
Science Museum, Dallas, Texas (or...huh?)
Why are today’s buildings and cities in so many parts of the world so ugly and uninviting? Why have our built environments become dispiriting wastelands? This is a topic JHK has been invested in for decades, and he writes extensively about architecture and urban planning on his blog, along with politics and social issues. His books, website and podcast are invaluable resources to help us answer these questions.
Ann Sussman adds an interesting wrinkle here by proposing that the early modernists in architecture like Le Corbusier, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, Walter Gropius, Phillip Johnson and others came out of a time of great conflict, namely WWI, some even having served during the war who, Sussman says, exhibit symptoms of PTSD, a mental disorder that informed their life’s work. And not in a good way.
Le Corbusier's Aborted Paris Plan, 1925
The Modernist movement both in architecture and the Arts came about, in part, as a rejection of ‘the past’, particularly after the horrors of WWI—arguably the first industrialized war (and unfortunately not the last). ‘The Past’ brought about the killing fields Europe, therefore architects like Le Corbusier, for example, were determined to wipe it all away and start with a clean slate. His proposed (and thankfully never developed) city plans for Paris is an example of this rejection of the past—with its scale and in the use of modern materials like glass and steel, the elimination of decorative elements, and so on. It reminds me of a machine, rather than as something that is part of people’s lives. And schools of architecture continue to promote dismal, dispiriting or just plain absurd design principles. A particular bug-a-boo of mine is the ROM museum in Toronto, Ontario where the Bloor Street addition to the structure strikes me as hideous and lacking any relationship with the surrounding streetscape. It looks like a giant, cosmic space-goitre!
Paris, Today (thankfully!)
Buildings—public buildings, commercial ones, homes and residences, streets, parks, etc. are for people. They must provide us with a sense of security and safety as well as make sense to our hard-wired neurology. Structures like the ROM’s only confuse us and repel our senses. At least mine. By the way, can anybody tell me where the main entrance to the building is? It used to be around the corner, off of University Ave. When I went to Toronto some years ago to view an exhibit there, I had to actually look for it! I watched people line up at a door that looked more like the entrance to some hidden, after-hours night club or suburban Cineplex. 
Royal Ontario Museum Space Goitre Addition
(A clue: it’s that small black rectangle underneath one of the jutting glass and steel wings.)
Stupid and ugly!
Breaking News: Alien Space Goitre Crash Lands on ROM!
There are many examples of how our cities are designed to work against human neurology and physiology. We need to be building cities that are walkable, that have streets that are human in scale and provide a sense of welcome and order for those living and working there. There’s much that needs to be done to change things. Perhaps Covid-19 will offer us the opportunity for a reset? Time will tell.
The interview with Ann Sussman can be found here: https://kunstler.com/writings/podcast/  


Cheers, Jake 

"WTF?!"


Monday, 13 July 2020

RANT: A LITTLE HOPE IN THE NIGHT



"Last night, when I escaped from the neighborhood, it was burning. The houses, the trees, the people: Burning.
     Smoke awoke me, and I shouted down the hall to Cory and the boys. I grabbed my clothes and emergency pack and followed Cory as she herded the boys out.
     The bell never rang. Our watchers must have been killed before they could reach it.
     Everything was chaos. People running, screaming, shooting. The gate had been destroyed. Our attackers had driven an ancient truck through it. They must have stolen a truck just to crash it through our gate.
     I think they must have been pyro addicts—bald people with painted heads, faces and hands. Red faces; blue faces; green faces; screaming mouths; avid, crazy eyes, glittering in the firelight." (Parable, 154)

I WAS READING THE SCI-FI NOVEL Parable of the Sower by Octavia Butler late one night. Protests and looting were happening in a number of American cities over the outrageous killing of George Floyd by police in Minneapolis. Protests were growing in other cities, in other countries, too, including Canada. Every siren or loud voice I heard in the street outside my window made me scrunch down a little lower into my blankets in case there were any wayward bullets flying about. Fact and fiction were at a dangerous crossroads, it seemed.
Well, I really don’t have to worry about that happening around here, but there are places, quite a few actually, that do. And that’s real and that’s terrible.

Much of the subsequent protests here and around world—Black Lives Matter, Defund the Police, the demands that certain statues be removed from public spaces and so on continued throughout June and into July. Covid-19 still hammers away at some countries like the United States, now Brazil and India, with outbreaks of active cases spiking in areas that previously saw declines. And to say that economies are struggling to recover from months of downtime is an understatement; we just don’t know what the other side of this will look like. How many jobs will be recovered? How many lives will be restored to some semblance of normality? It’s too soon to tell. We’re on the knife-edge of change and things will probably have to go pear-shaped first before the costs of this pandemic, and the social and economic consequences are fully fleshed out and understood. 
As the ever-entertaining Max Kaiser on RT America’s Kaiser Report news show opined recently:

"We’re heading into a global depression which, what we are saying here, might be a good thing because values come back. In other words, during a period of global expansion with fiat money, values go out the window and conspicuous consumption becomes the most obvious way people display their character to  each other, and now as we head into a global depression that will be done [with], and we have will have more values again [meaning], people will bake more at home, knitting, crocheting, doing blanket-weaving…but that‘s actually a good thing you know, because people are more comfortable with a world based on human values instead of conspicuous consumption… It’ll be kind of painful for a while, but at the other end of this will be something a lot more humane and enjoyable [for] humans." (The Kaiser Report, E1562)

But, instead of sitting in my bathtub with a razor blade, I decided to read another book: John Crowley’s The Deep, his first published work of science fiction that came out in 1975. Again, I read it under the covers, late at night, hiding from the torches and clubs of looters outside my window, and the book took me to a strange and claustrophobic world  divided between two factions—the “Reds” and the “Blacks”: dynasties that timelessly battled for supremacy on a world that was strangely bounded and circumscribed.
Crowley is a master prose writer (and I so envy him!) who depicts a world in miniature which nevertheless embodies complex human societies and interactions. Think: two factions of medieval warlords, each struggling to grow and acquire power, land, armies, etc. Over time, one becomes dominant and rules the world from the “City” that sits at the centre of their world. Gradually, over time, the other faction grows in strength and stealth, and eventually it becomes the ruling party of the world—Red then Black, then Red again, generation after generation; rinse and repeat for millennia in a seemingly endless cycle. But in this world of Crowley's devising there is also room for beauty and small enchantments as, for example, when he describes the royal bedchamber:
   
"There are seven windows in the Queen’s bedroom in the Citadel that is the center of the City that is on the lake island called the Hub in the middle of the world.
Two of the seven windows face the tower stones and are dark; two overlook inner courtyards; two face the complex lanes that wind between the high, blank-faced mansions of the Protectorate; and the seventh, facing the steep Street of Birdsellers and, beyond, a crack in the ring of mountains across the lake, is always filled at night with stars. When wind speaks in the mountains, it whispers in this window, and makes the fine brown bed hangings dance." (Deep, 12)

As Crowley develops his characters and plot, and describes the complex social layers found in his world, elements of repetitiveness and ‘bounded traditionalism' become apparent, leading the reader to wonder why the same things are done over and over. Crowley reveals the reason [spoiler alert!] in the ending chapters as two main characters, “The Secretary” (also known as “The Visitor”), and the assassin, Nyamè, journey to the literal edge of the world. Here we learn that their world is the creation of an alien being with vast, god-like powers. It is a giant disk situated upon “The Deep”, like a sundial atop its pedestal (minus its gnomon or arm), floating somewhere in space with an artificial sun and moons orbiting it. The Visitor plays an important role in maintaining balance in a world which should seem like a mere plaything for a bored and errant god, yet doesn’t. Again credit is due Crowley for his ability to create real, breathing landscapes and complex characters. We learn that the world has existed in this manner for many thousands of generations, neither progressing nor regressing beyond certain limits. This is due to periodic interventions by "Visitors"—robots devised by the world’s creator to ensure there will be continual conflict between the Red and Black factions, essentially ‘culling’ the human population so it does not exceed the carrying capacity of the disk-world. 
The circularity and sameness of their institutions, their goals, attitudes and beliefs are now understandable. But this circular history, where people live in cycles of repetitive warfare and empire building is coming to an end by the novel’s climax. Nyamè returns from her experience at the world’s edge as a half-mad religious visionary whose utterances may someday engender a new set of beliefs and insights about the world for her people to adopt. And the Visitor, who was damaged upon its arrival to the world, has failed to ignite the standard fighting between Red and Black, who consequently have stood down their forces and entered into a new era of peace, thus breaking the mould that has kept their society in stasis for millennia.
What will happen when their history unfolds unimpeded by ‘divine intervention’ is an open question. But their lives now hold new possibilities undreamt of before. Sennred, the king’s younger brother, in the wake of the new world that is dawning before him, no longer feels bound by the constraints of perpetual conflict. He is free to leave the past behind, with its centuries of rutted tradition, and to think of something else.

     "He stepped carefully past the grinning kings [portraits on the wall] to the door Defensible, newly widened that winter. His laughing servant held a brand-new travelling cloak for him.
      And what if it was not madness at all, not ephemeral? What if Time had indeed burst out of his old accustomed round, gone adventuring on some new path? Would he know? And would it matter if he did?
     He took the cloak from his servant. He would see Caredd [the beautiful, young widow he loves] soon, and that did matter, very much." (180)     

Love indeed matters. As does a life not bound by tradition, but one instead that grows tall and strong from its roots. Ah! Crowley. He gives us a little hope in the night…

Cheers, Jake

"Edge? What edge? Hah!"


--Octavia E. Butler, Parable of the Sower. Grand Central Publishing. The Hachette Book Group. New York, NY, 2000, 2007.
--John Crowley, The Deep, Doubleday and Co., Inc., New York, 1975








 
[a Note for fans of Chris Hedges. Earlier this year, Hedges and several other writers and staff were summarily fired from their positions with the online newszine Truthdig which may no longer be in operation. You can find his writings at Common Dreams and at the new website SheerPost.]


Wednesday, 1 July 2020

QUOTES: RICHARD WOOLF


“All words that are important in history have been picked up and used by all kind of characters, for all kinds of reasons.”
― Richard D. Wolff