![]() |
Pro-Palestinian demonstration Parliament Hill, 12 April 2025 |
ON THAT FRONT, last
Saturday there was a recent pro-Palestinian protest on
Parliament Hill in Ottawa condemning the recent sale of “artillery propellant”
to the United States. Protestors claim the munitions shipment to the United States,
worth over seventy-five million dollars, comes with an explicit provision that
tags the propellant as being for Israel. In the past, Canada could hide behind
the fig-leaf of 'third-party use' restrictions for weapons sales to United States. Recall, last year, how Global
Affairs Minister, Melanie Joly, under considerable media scrutiny at the time, stopped
sales of “high explosive mortar cartridges” to the U.S. as they were tagged to
be re-exported by the Americans to Israel. Minister Joly promised that weapons sales
to the United States were contingent on their not being sent to regimes
that abuse human rights. And Ottawa, at the time, was uncharacteristically
critical of Israel and its arguably genocidal actions in Gaza. You would
think Canadian officials would be on their toes doing everything in their power
to deny the Israeli military weaponry it then uses in Gaza, a setting for war crimes and as gross a violation of human rights as
we’ve seen since the end of the second world war. Just sayin’.
ANOTHER check
to stop Canadian-made munitions from being used by Israel is (or should be) the fact that Canada
is a signatory to the “Arms Trade Treaty” (2013)
that seeks to put ‘guard rails’ on the global sales of conventional weaponry.
“The ATT,
adopted in April 2013 and entering into force in December 2014, is the first
international treaty to regulate the conventional arms trade. The treaty was
realized after years of advocacy by civil society organizations from around the
world, which celebrated it as a transformative multilateral framework that would
address the humanitarian toll posed by the unchecked trade and transfer of
military goods. Core obligations of States Parties to the ATT include ensuring that arms
exports will not be used in human-rights violations, increasing transparency in
the arms trade, and safeguarding against the diversion of conventional arms. At
the time of this report’s publication, the treaty included 116
States Parties — more than half of the world’s countries.” (Ploughshares)
WHILE MINISTER JOLY
CANCELLED the multi-million-dollar cartridge sale, it has recently come to
light that Global Affairs Canada signed off on the sale to the United States of
artillery propellant used in conjunction with the ever-popular 155-millimeter artillery
shell. The sale agreement was clearly tagged as being “for Israel”, and the
deal was brokered by the crown corporation, CCC (Canadian Commercial Corporation), between GD-OTS
(General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical System-Canada) and the American DOD
(Department of Defense). GDO-Canada, the subsidiary or evil stepchild of the giant
American arms manufacturer produces the ammunition in Quebec at its
idyll-sounding “Valleyfield” plant, which is “the sole source of this type
of propellant for the US Army, which is responsible for supplying most
munitions to US military aid recipients, including Israel.” (Ploughshares)
AND this deal came only weeks after Joly stopped
the cartridges sale in August of last year. Hence, last weekend’s protest on
Parliament Hill.
![]() |
Viet Nam protestor: Flowers, not bullets |
The Ottawa protest highlights the lack of transparency governing
the sale of munitions to the United States and the specific complaint of Canada
being culpable, with its munitions sales via the U.S. to Israel, in the Gazan genocide.
“This…reveals
the flaws in the arms free-trade zone between Canada and the United States,
which allows the provision of armaments to regimes that abuse human rights,
without scrutiny from, or accountability on the part of, Canadian officials.
Other examples include the more than $100 million in Canadian-made F-35 components
that have been exported to Israel through the US DOD.” (Ploughshares)
Your tax
dollars at work. Have a nice day.😯
Cheers, Jake.____________________________
* I'll discuss Yves' case in a separate post.
No comments:
Post a Comment