![]() |
| "Atlantis is here. No. Wait...It's over here." |
IN THE CRITIAS, Plato writes that the politician, Critias, before beginning his account of the war between Athens and Atlantis, invokes “Mnemosyne”, the goddess of memory, to aid him in reciting the history as it was passed down through his family, from Solon, many years before. He wants to present all the information as accurately as possible to Socrates* and the others listening to him:
“Let me begin by observing first of all, that nine thousand [italics mine] was the sum of years which had elapsed since the war which was said to have taken place between those who dwelt outside the Pillars of Heracles and all who dwelt within them; this war I am going to describe.”
(Plato, Critias)
Aristotle, Plato’s student, was skeptical the tale was based on actual events and thought it was instead something devised by Plato as a teaching tool. Crantor, a student of a student of Plato, a generation later, believed otherwise, with some scholars attributing to him (Crantor) an account (since lost) of a journey he had made to Egypt to confirm Critias’s story. The controversy over Plato’s Atlantis has continued ever since.
The Fifth Century A.D. neo-Platonist writer, Proclus, while skeptical of the historicity of Atlantis in Plato’s Critias is less so in his commentary on the Timaeus (book two of Plato’s proposed triology) which also described the sunken island civilization. He cites another, earlier source (“Marcellus”) as verification of the authenticity of Plato’s tale.
“….inhabitants of it—they add—preserved the remembrance from their ancestors of the immeasurably large island of Atlantis which had really existed there and which for many ages had reigned over all islands in the Atlantic sea and which itself had like-wise been sacred to Poseidon. Now these things Marcellus has written in his Aethiopica.” [which means “Ethiopian Tale”]
(Proclus, critique on Timaeus)
The early Christian, Carthaginian writer Tertullian (born 160 A.D.) believed Plato’s tale, as did the Sixth Century map-maker Cosmas Indicopleustes (his name means: “Cosmas who sailed to India”), though he used the mid-Atlantic site of Atlantis to bolster his thesis the world was flat. So, there’s that.
![]() |
| "Atlantis, according to the Egyptians and the description of Plato." |
Skipping ahead a few centuries, the late-16th Century cartographer, Abraham Ortelius, speculated that the European and American continents had once been connected when the correspondence between their coastlines is examined. His ideas anticipated modern tectonic plate theory by several centuries, and he wrote with Atlantis in mind:
"Unless it be a fable, the island of Gadir…[Cadiz] will be the remaining part of the island of Atlantis or America, which was not sunk (as Plato reports in the Timaeus) so much as torn away from Europe and Africa by earthquakes and flood...” (Ortelius, Thesaurus Geographicus)
With the discovery of the Americas, some writers and scholars wondered if this “New World” was, in fact, the legendary Atlantis, or else that it held remnants of the drowned civilization whose descendants existed in a devolved form as various indigenous peoples of the Americas, especially after Mayan and Aztec ruins were uncovered and seen as evidence of a once-superior, Atlantean race.
“Mayanism” and similar ethnographic speculations were popular in the 19th Century, with Atlantean theories remaining a small, though withering, branch of this discipline. As Rationalism and the Scientific Method came to dominate Western investigatory efforts during the Nineteenth Century, theories around Atlantis became relegated primarily to esoteric and “spiritualist” circles. Advances in geology, archaeology, histography and ethnology made clearer distinctions between myth and legends and verifiable scientific proofs. Speculation around Atlantis waned.
![]() |
| Ignatius Donnelly |
His book and its sequel, Ragnarök: The Age of Fire and Gravel (which tells of Atlantis’s destruction by floods created when a giant meteorite strikes the Earth) spawned numerous fiction and non-fiction spin-offs including the theory of another giant, mid-ocean continent, this time in the Pacific, called “Mu” or “Lemuria” by other writers.
Donnelly’s
story of Atlantis was to be a particular influence in the emerging occult
scene, notably with Madam Blavatsky, a Russian emigree to the United States, who
began the Theosophical Society in the 1880s, which was dedicated to the metaphysical
arts. In her 1889 The Secret Doctrine, she adds to Donnelly’s vision and
reinterprets Plato’s tale of the Atlanteans as invaders. To her, they were
heroes out of a time nearly 1,000,000 years ago, who became decadent, and whose
civilization was destroyed, not by natural causes, but by their own psychic
powers unwisely used.**
![]() |
| Edgar Cayce |
TODAY, Google
Book’s helpful Ngram viewer, which compiles percentages of word-use
in print since 1400 A.D.+, has the word “Atlantis” at its second-highest
point of use during the middle decades of the Eighteenth Century, peaking
slightly higher in the late 1800s (Donnelly’s book) with its usage in print by 2019 at a mid-point frequency. And yes, I know: The word “Atlantis” still seems to be prevalent today across our cultural landscape, and in our skeptical,
post-modern, myth-adverse age this seems counter-intuitive. I think the answer lies
in advertisements and logos, signage and the like—with the word used as a totem or
eye-catching tagline that appears in such highlights as “Atlantis-Paradise Island: ![]() |
| Atlantis: Dubai |
The word “Atlantis” is in the voodoo of advertising, pop culture and remnant New Age schtick. But those aren’t the only places where it's found.
SO THERE WE STAND. A story written over 2300 years ago, debated and ignored, praised and
ridiculed, studied and dismissed. And yet, still it’s there in front of us, or in the back of our minds, or it’s on the tips of our tongues—from a
bedtime story read to us when we were a child, or in a song, or on the cover of
dime store novel. It’s also found in expeditions launched in search of the lost isle, something we haven’t yet discussed.
![]() |
| Atlantean Empire According to Donnelly |
![]() |
| Map of Mediterranean "Atlantises" |
Yeah, my head exploded, too, with the Mt. Everest and Antarctica possibilities. But, I guess more than just paint flakes. For now, I'd like to detour into the Mediterranean and mention a couple of sites that hold a little more promise as Plato's lost Atlantis.
![]() |
| Thera (Santorini) |
![]() |
| Bull Leaping Fresco at Knossos |
OCCULT WRITER AND ALL-ROUND POLYMATH, John Michael Greer, as a thought experiment, suggests the possibility that a
sea-faring civilization might once have existed in the now-submerged land mass off
Cuba and the Bahamas during the last Ice Age when sea
levels were much lower. Greer speculates that a confederate, island-based culture
could have developed in the Gulf of Mexico, whose sovereignty extended
into the surrounding hinterlands of North and Central America, and one predating the Western Hemisphere's aboriginal societies that developed after the last Ice Age. These Gulf Islanders may even have
even conducted trans-Atlantic trade and thus encountered Mediterranean societies as described in Plato's Critias and Timaeus. Such ancient ocean-spanning
voyages may not be as unlikely as they first seem. Nor can the possibility of European
settlement along the East Coast region of North America prior to 10,000 B.C. be ruled out completely. Traces of such ancient, coastal
settlements or of the intriguing Gulf Islands civilization that Greer hypothesizes--another candidate for
the ‘ur-Atlantis’ of myth and legend--today, unfortunately, lay beneath the risen seas and little
evidence of their past may be recoverable++. WE ASK: WHY DOES ATLANTIS REMAIN such a popular cultural meme? We talk about it, here for instance. We explore for it. We have fantasies about swimming beneath the waves with Atlantean mer-people. There are books, movies, songs, and paintings about the lost isle. Yet do we ever get close to it? do we understand it, even a little? I said earlier that Atlantis was already found and, frankly, you can take your pick on so many lost civilizations and disappeared cities in the last 10,000 years, and nail Atlantis to its mantle. Many people do, regardless of whether their choice is logical. (Though, perhaps logic is overrated.) So, in a sense, it has been found, again and again; it depends on what you’re searching for. Are you looking for a place in the past? Or perhaps the future? John Michael Greer thinks the search for Atlantis, what it represents, is more about how we see and understand our future than it is about the location of a specific, watery site, Antarctica notwithstanding.
What if conclusive evidence were found proving, say, the Tartessos location in southern Spanish coast was where Atlantis was located? After sifting carefully through all the remains and the ruins, collecting, and restoring what was possible, what would we have? And don’t get me wrong—I LOVE the study and contemplation of prehistory, our remote past, but in the end, we’d still have a museum full of the remains of another extinct civilization. There are many such sites in the world, and many more yet to be found. Again, I’m not trying to make light of this. Expanding our understanding of our past, however flawed or incomplete our reasoning may be, is entirely relevant to our present, and Greer says it is crucial for our future, as well. He writes:
“At the same time, attempts to locate Atlantis in many corners of the world have turned up evidence for many lost cities and civilizations, raising the uncomfortable possibility that the fall of Atlantis may have been only one of many civilization-wrecking catastrophes in the history of our species.” (Greer, 151)
Related to this is a passage from Plato's second Dialogue, the Timaeus, where Critias is again reporting the words of the old Egyptian priest and what he was supposed to have told Solon about the Atlantean-Athenian War 9000 years in the past. The priest says something interesting:
“O Solon, Solon, you Hellenes are never anything but children, and there is not an old man among you.” Solon in return asked him what he meant. “I mean to say,” he replied, “that in mind you are all young; there is no old opinion handed down among you by ancient tradition, nor any science which is hoary with age. And I will tell you why. There have been, and will be again, many destructions of mankind arising out of many causes; the greatest have been brought about by the agencies of fire and water, and other lesser ones by innumerable other causes.” (Plato, Timaeus)
The old priest is telling Solon, and us, about the impermanence of civilizations—that they come and go and are at the whim of nature’s forces. And importantly, their memory is also lost, time and again. We keep losing vital lessons, traditions, practices, and technologies of the past. It's like he's reminding us that we keep re-inventing the wheel, and that all the ‘progress’ we made is an illusion. We are always where we are, so to speak.
John Michael Greer (he is a druid and practicing occultist) makes this point in discussing the need to preserve various occult practices into the future. He warns of “the fragility of human knowledge” (210), and how we must preserve the knowledge of the mystical arts, along with a suite of “other legacies of the past and present—literary, artistic, cultural, scientific, and practical…to be kept for the future.” (212) Greer also suggests one more thing: We must not assume because we have spaceships and smartphones that we are superior to those who came before us, that our ancient ancestors were mere ‘rough drafts’ of ourselves, maquettes to be discarded with the sculptor’s final work. We share a common humanity that expresses itself in different ways at different times. Thus, our “…forgotten cultures [come] with values and thought patterns very different from ours, and the things they saw, heard, and felt…probably don’t have much in common with our current ideas…” (221) It is by understanding this fact in its breadth and depth that Atlantis will be found.
THERE WILL BE FOUND NO SUBMARINES or death-rays in the artifacts and ruins of Atlantis when we finally discover it. And, again, does that mean we, with our science and technology, are superior to those ancient, less-technologically proficient Atlanteans? Can we be so sure we understand their society, their worldview, knowledge and skills, their technologies? And if we cannot be superior, then what can we be? Where are we on the scale of one to ten between primitive and god?
Just as the past is limited by our perceptions of it, the future can be as limitless as our ability to imagine a range of possibilities beyond the ones our current civilization offers, trapped as we are in the hallucinatory vision of perpetual progress with which our fossil fuel-enhanced technologies blankets us. We can’t see the impermanence of our times, that the arc we think we're on, the one we assume soars ever upward into space, is really the arc of a circle, at most a spiral, and while making for a much smaller, more humbler journeying, perhaps, it is one that is still vital and important.
Cheers, Jake.
“Atlantis” definition: "Site of the island of Atlantis, in the sea, from Egyptian sources and Plato's description. 17th C. Athanasias Kircher [MAP]
Mythical island-nation, by 1730, from Greek Atlantis, literally "daughter of Atlas," noun use of fem. adjective from Atlas (stem Atlant-; see Atlas). All references trace to Plato's dialogues "Timaeus" and "Critias," both written c. 360 B.C.E.
* Socrates appears in the Critias along with the politician Critias (a historical figure), Hermocrates and Timaeus. The four are characters in a dialogue written by Plato. Socrates, himself, left no written texts, save a single poem. What we know of him comes from the writings of his students Plato and Xenophon, or through contemporaries like the comedy playwright, Aristophanes. But the question remains: Was Critias’s account, as written by Plato, based on a real civilization destroyed by flood in the deep past?
** It should be said that Theosophy was a school of occult philosophy and the Atlantis myth, as a belief system, was used as a “gateway” into deeper esoteric training by Blavatsky. One well-known theosophist was Ruldolf Steiner, who was the founder of anthroposophy, and the Waldorf Schools in the 1930s.
+ Prior to 1400 A.D. use of the word was flatlined. (The church frowned upon any form of pagan beliefs. Plato was a pagan, so what do you think you're doing reading him?!?) The mid-Eighteenth-Century uptic is probably due to publications like Robinson Crusoe and Gulliver’s Travels that stirred the public’s imagination and writers’ inventions. As well, the rise of scientific studies such as geology and cosmology began piecing together the natural history of our world, and Atlantis, from time to time, featured in such speculations. The later Nineteenth Century surge of "Atlantis" in print was because of Donnelly’s book, of course.)
++ The “Bimini Road” may be a trace of such a past civilization existing in the Gulf region as Greer hypothesizes. Bimini is a small island in the westernmost region of the Bahamas chain. And the “road” is a stretch of underwater stonework that looks remarkably like the remains of an ancient road. The jury is still out on this one.
1. For an interesting excursion into an underwater and dry land archaeological dig check out the 1973 "expedition" (read: "grifting operation") to Cadiz to explore possible Atlantaen ruins. Led by Maxine Archer, an "Alantologist", and author of several books on the lost isle, she seems also to have been a bit of a scam artist in her day, specifically with her Iowa-based diploma-mill operation that ran afoul of federal authorites by the late 1990s. Still, I wouldn't mind snorkeling around the Mediterranean with her--she was a babe! (I'd hang onto my wallet, though.)
2. See recent excavations on Santorini.
Adams, Mark. Meet Me in Atlantis: My Obsessive Quest to Find the Sunken City. Penguin Random House Company. New York, New York. 2015.
Greer, John Michael. Atlantis: Ancient Legacy, Hidden Prophecy. Llewellyn Publications, Woodbury, Minnesota. 2007.
Plato. Critias
-- Timeaus
[And Donovan, of course.]


















No comments:
Post a Comment