Did she think it was a tater-tot?
Or a tissue full of day-old snot?”
GOOOOOD MORRRRNIN’ THIS MORNIN’, WORLD!
Retrospective page in the Sunday news.
It seems we’ve got those 50s blues.
Again we have to pick and choose
between what's real and realer.
One penny, two penny, three penny, three
little brown babies sleeping ‘neath a tree.
A-long comes a bomb-er bombing his-tor-eee.
(In between SPORTS and the WEATHER.)
Great Leader held a Greats meeting.
Great Leader was great at Greats greeting.
But Great Leader telled at great cheating.
(With his fly way down again.)
Put down the paper, Eye-leen.
Don’t you read that ma-ga-zeen.
Don’t listen to those ray-dee-oh screams.
“Let’s just eat our breakfast, shall we?”
The world’s now a convenience store
where shoppers get more, and then more,
and discounts are just to die for!
And it’s open 24/7.
Huffing air from dirty brown tins
(just like it was some Great War sin.)
Can we say now our time begins?
But quick before the ink dries!
So what do we do now, Boo-Boo?
Between what is wild and the zoo?
Do we heed what is all too true?
Or take our lumps with our pudding?
Ursula K. Le Guin |
JESTER QUITS! KING'S FOOL LEAVES PALACE |
“Finally, the question arises, is the book a Utopia? It seems to me that it is quite clearly not; it poses no practicable alternative to contemporary society, since it is based on an imaginary, radical change in human anatomy. All it tries to do is to open up an alternative viewpoint, to widen the imagination, without making any very definite suggestions as to what might be seen from that new viewpoint. The most it says is, I think, something like this: If we were socially ambisexual, if men and women were completely and genuinely equal in their social roles, equal legally and economically, equal in freedom, in responsibility, and in self-esteem, then society would be a very different thing. What our problems might be, God knows; I only know we would have them. But it seems likely that our central problem would not be the one it is now: the problem of exploitation—exploitation of the woman, of the weak, of the earth. Our curse is alienation, the separation of yang from yin. Instead of a search for balance and integration, there is a struggle for dominance. Divisions are insisted upon, interdependence is denied. The dualism of value that destroys us, the dualism of superior/inferior, ruler/ruled, owner/owned, user/used, might give way to what seems to me, from here, a much healthier, sounder, more promising modality of integration and integrity.” (168-9) [Italics mine. ed.]
THE PROBLEM OF EXPLOITATION—in our politics, our economics, our social orderings, and our personal lives—as Le Guin suggests, is the great bugaboo of modernity. So often our lives are lived distracted and distanced from this reality. At times, we are exploited, at other times we’re the exploiters. And while it is fairly certain Entropy always wins in the end, how we spend our energy in the course of our lives—developing our skills and knowledge, building resilient families and communities, sharing with, caring for, loving and accepting others will surely make our lives, and the lives of all those who share our world, that much richer, longer and more enjoyable.
Cheers, Jake.
Ursula K. Le Guin, “Is Gender Necessary?” in The Language of the Night: Essays on Fantasy and Science Fiction, ed. Susan Wood, G. P. Putnam’s Sons, New York, 1979
No comments:
Post a Comment