I
almost didn’t read Yan Martel’s new novel, The
High Mountains of Portugal. I’d borrowed it from the library just before
they closed due to the pandemic and it sat on my bedside To Read pile for a while—I had a bunch of apocalyptic fiction to
get to first; during pandemics there are priorities, after all. But I picked it
up the other day and I’m glad I did. It was an engaging read and well worth the
time.
The
book is divided into three chapters: “Homeless”, “Homeward” and “Home”, each set
in a different time period with the action occurring, for the most part, in the
sparsely-settled, rural, north-west of Portugal. As Martel describes, the area
is hardly ‘mountainous’, as the name might suggest, being little more than a rocky,
scrubland plateau of heath and thickets, though it is dotted with huge, meters-high
boulders left by ancient glaciers, which may suggest “mountains” to the
passerby. The people there live on small farms with herds of goats and sheep
and vegetable allotments. In the villages, their houses and fences are all made
of stone, but the people themselves, as Martel shows us, are anything but
stone-like, with hidden strengths and subtleties and deeply felt emotions and
beliefs.
The
book jacket describes the novel, in part, as a “…Tale of Loss and Love”, and
the deaths of several characters, young and old,* as well as their loves, are
central to the novel’s story, linking four generations across decades and
oceans.
The
book opens with Tomás walking through the streets of Lisbon on a bright summer’s
morning in the year 1904 to visit his uncle. He has an important favour to ask
him, and while he’s always a bit anxious meeting with his wealthy Uncle Martim,
the day’s weather is congenial and it lightens his mood as he strolls across
the city. Martel captures the pace and setting of Lisbon at the turn of the Twentieth
Century with quiet, subtle descriptions. For several pages we follow Tomás
though a city drawn as if in pastels from another, less garish time, with only
the occasional odd description of his stride or an obstacle he trips over, or a
comment a passerby makes to him to disturb our morning’s walk. It’s only after several
pages we are told that Tomás is walking to his uncle’s house backwards.
As
a reader you’re immediately hooked of course, and needing to find out at once about this strange procession
Tomás and the author are taking you. It’s a bit like stepping onto a train platform
only to discover you’re actually on a merry-go-round! What is going on?
We
learn by the end of “Homeless” the reason for Tomás’s odd form of locomotion: It
involves the trauma he experienced following the death of his lover and their child,
and his beloved father, all within days of each other. Much to the
consternation and embarrassment of his uncle, Tomás began walking backwards shortly
after the funerals. We learn he does so in a protest against God, who he feels has
taken all the joy from life and the possibility for future happiness. Hence, he
will walk backwards looking at the past as it still exists, and deny what the
future and God’s destiny, looking forward, hold for him. Tomás, in his despair
following the loss of his family, comes to believe that God really does not
have a place on earth, as revealed through his son, Jesus Christ. Instead, God is
an indifferent and implacable entity, alien and remote from humanity and its
suffering. He does not deny God’s existence; rather, he wishes to punish him by
revealing to the world proof of the false divinity of his son.
Yann Martel |
He
decides on this course of action during his work as a curator at the city
museum when he discovers the diary of a Seventeenth Century priest, Father
Ulisses, who missioned on São Tomè, a small Portuguese island-colony off the
coast of Equatorial Guinea, which functioned as a transit port in the African
slave trade. Tomás reads that Father Ulisses, who like his namesake from Greek mythology,
journeys far from home, wished to become a “slave priest” ministering to slaves
working the cocoa plantations on the small island and to those in transit to
other colonies. But over time his efforts to convert the somber, sullen
Africans to Christianity go unrewarded. Increasingly, he is wracked with a
sense of helplessness and despair, and comes to feel that his life’s work has
been in vain. Eventually, Father Ulisses is alienated from both his church and
the slave population who ignores him. Like Tomás, he loses his faith in a
loving god and a resurrected Christ, and in his diary indicates—and this is
what interests Tomás, reading the priest’s account some two and a half
centuries later—that he has carved a crucifix depicting this heretical, deist vision.
Through considerable research, the now-obsessed Tomás discovers the relic is
located in one of several possible churches in rural north-western Portugal. This
object, his fevered reasoning deduces, will be a revelation to the world and his revenge on a god that took away his lover
and son. Thus, he borrows his uncle’s luxurious and well-provisioned Renault
and proceeds to drive into the High Mountains of Portugal to find it.
Most
of “Homeless” is concerned with the journey Tomás makes and in which Martel
details the often comic trials and tribulations that the young man, who is an
inexperienced driver, endures as he threads his way across Portugal, with the
car—for all intents and purposes—itself becoming a character in the story. Tomás’s
obsession leads him ever onward, despite all that the landscape, its people and
his mechanical bête noir can do to
prevent him from reaching his goal.
A
major theme throughout High Mountains
is engagement with others, especially the idea of seeing and being seen, with a
recurring motif of “eyes”. For example, in a tragic event that has Tomás
accidentally running over and killing a young boy, he notes the startling blue
of the dead boy’s open eyes. In the
final chapter, “Home”, set some eighty years following the events of “Homeless”,
the retired Canadian senator Peter Tovy’s life-changing journey begins when he first
encounters the gaze of a chimpanzee in an Oklahoma zoo.
“It
continues to stare into his eyes. Peter doesn’t know why, but his throat
tightens and he feels close to tears. Is it that no one since Clara has looked
at him like that, fully and frankly, the eyes like open doors?” (235)
It is
interesting that both Tomás in “Homeless” and Doctor Lozora in “Homeward” are
recent widowers (as, too, is Peter in “Home”), who suffer deeply the loss of
their beloved wives, and in the case of Tomás, his son as well. They no longer
have intimates in their lives; there is no one to engage with, no ‘other’ who
looks at them “fully and frankly”, anymore. Both Tomás and Lozora do not wish to
have anyone else in their lives; they are bereft, refusing to seek solace or
support with others. Tomás descends into irrationality, walking backwards,
barely keeping up appearances. He becomes obsessed with recovering Father
Ulisses’s crucifix, making his long journey in a machine few had seen at that
time in the country, suffering mishap after mishap, and rarely asking for help.
He avoids villages and roadways where he might encounter people, his strange
vehicle attracting crowds (who are not always friendly) wherever he went. And
he has trouble with the clutch. And changing gears! And is “moto-naphtha” fuel
flammable? (Yes!) He arrives in Tuizelo disordered and disheveled, his car a
wreck, and by chance stumbles across what he’s been searching for in the tiny
village church. At the end of “Homeless”, Tomás’s last words are a cry for help
to the local priest, as he collapses outside the church. (We later learn that
he spoke only briefly with the priest before leaving the village and the novel,
as always walking backwards.)
In the middle
chapter, “Homeward”, we learn from his receptionist that poor Doctor Lozora has
been working long hours, often in a state of exhaustion, refusing help or time
off following the death of his wife, Maria. His withdrawal from others is such
that he even refuses the offer from his colleague to perform the autopsy on her;
instead he performs the task himself. Maria has died falling from a bridge
under unclear circumstances. Does he hope to recover her in some fashion by
examining her constituent parts? In a way, yes. Perhaps, he wishes to discover
‘how she lived,’ as the elderly Marie Castros will later ask him to do by
performing an autopsy on her husband. “Open him up, tell me how
he lived?” (184) It may be possible that he performs the operation to discover
something in Maria that will help him
live without her in his life. He is in despair, and remains so at the end
of the chapter, but there is a hopeful moment when his receptionist decides to
go into his office to console him.
Both he and Tomás
have lost their sense of home they had
shared with their wives—with Tomás far from Lisbon in the High Mountains of
Portugal and Doctor Lozora unable to return to the apartment he shared with his
recently-deceased wife, sleeping instead in his office at the hospital.
However, in
the “Home” chapter Peter, in a strange twist of fate following the death
of his wife some months earlier, discovers such a bond of intimacy with
Odo the chimpanzee, and the final third of the book is a depiction of their
relationship and growing mutual acceptance.
Together,
this strange couple makes a home in Tuizelo, and we watch as Peter strives to
understand the ape and to accept him
on his level, wholly and completely and without reservation. Odo does this with
Peter quite naturally, whereas it is something Peter must carefully and respectfully
learn. On the phone to his sister Theresa, living in Toronto, he says:
“Sometimes
I think Odo breathes time, in and out in and out. I sit next to him and I watch
him weave a blanket made of minutes and hours. And while we’re on top of a
boulder watching a sunset, he’ll make a gesture with his hand, just something
in the air, and I swear he’s working an angle or smoothing a surface of a
sculpture whose shape I can’t see. but that doesn’t bother me. I’m in
the presence of a weaver of time and a maker of space.” (301)
Peter,
returning decades later to Tuizelo, the village of his birth and the place where
Tomás found his cross, is more alive to his world than he has ever been before.
He has come to a place he can truly call “home”.
Tomás,
on the other hand at the end of “Homeless”, is in despair and guilt-ridden over
the death of the young boy he has killed, and at a loss to understand his
feelings of emptiness and futility, even though he has discovered Father Ulisses’s
crucifix. With his discovery of the wooden cross portraying Jesus with seemingly
more ape-like features than human (and thus not an appropriate image for a
resurrected god) he feels this will prove to the world the non-divinity of
Jesus, that he was ‘just an ape’ and not the son of God. Jesus was not a fallen
god; he was a risen ape. Tomás would finally achieve his ‘revenge’ on God for
taking his son by taking God’s son, in turn. Thus, to the woman who’d let him
into the village church, he shouts:
“’Do you understand? You’ve been praying to a
crucified chimpanzee all these years. Your son of Man is not a god—he’s just an
ape on a cross!’” (129)
Ape
imagery is an important element linking the three settings and time periods of
the novel. As mentioned in the first chapter, we have Tomás’s wood carving of a
‘crucified ape’; in the final chapter we have Peter renting a house in Tuizelo
(which turns out to be his childhood home) and sharing it with Odo, the
chimpanzee he purchased from an American zoo.
In
between, we have Doctor Lozora and the strange case of Rafael Castros’s autopsy
on New Year’s Eve, 1939.
Doctor
Lozora was happy that evening. His lovely wife of thirty years had just visited
him as he worked late at the hospital. She spoke at length as they shared a
bottle of wine before the New Year arrived. She often spoke at length on many
topics, many of which were religious in nature. Maria, a fervent Catholic, was forever
tolerant and accepting of her agnostic, science-orientated husband. As a
present to him for the New Year, Maria set out, in a sense, to “Justify the ways of God to men,” in a
long speech where she argues that the gospels concerning Jesus’ life are really
meant to be seen as stories, as allegories that, at their core, are ‘murder
mysteries’! That is, they ask the question: “Who killed Jesus?” Was it Judas?
Pontius Pilate? The Jews? The Romans? Anonymous? The answer, really, is all of
us. We’re all guilty. The gospels are murder mysteries that we must read and
‘follow the clues’ to reach this conclusion. And she presents her husband with
the latest Agatha Christie mystery novel as a final offering. The English
novelist is his favorite writer, and Marie, in equating the gospels with murder
mysteries (the name “Christie” is so close to “Christ” after all), she gives
him permission to enjoy his light reading by imbuing the stories with deeper,
more timeless themes. She leaves him to finish his work, and he is left with a
feeling of abiding love and gratitude to her for her marvelous gift.
Almost
immediately there is a knock on his office door. Doctor Lozora rushes to open
it expecting to see his Maria; instead he is confronted with the elderly Marie
Castros who has come to the town of Bragança from Tuizelo in the High Mountains
of Portugal with a strange request.
She
wishes to be present as Doctor Lozora performs an autopsy on her husband. When
he objects, she reminds him that she has been his wife for over sixty years and
“I will be there with him.” (186) She is adamant and he reluctantly agrees.
Here Martel uses “magical realism”. As Doctor Loraza dissects Rafael’s body, objects are
uncovered: a red cloth, a flute, tools, mud, and several other items including,
most strange, the body of a chimpanzee curled around a teddy bear!
One
thing about the literary technique of magical realism is that it reminds you
that you are reading a story and like the gospel stories, for example, stories
are lies that tell the truth (or a truth). What are we
to make of this scene? We learn from Marie that when her son was mysteriously
killed, decades earlier some miles from Tuizelo (well, not so mysteriously,
for the reader knows it was Tomás) that she, like Lozora and Tomás died inside,
becoming bereft and living lives of despair. Apparently, this is how she has existed
all these years. Yet her husband, Rafael, somehow found the will, not just to
exist, but to find joy in life after their son’s death. The items
recovered from his body represent various aspects of his life that made him
feel alive: his work, his garden, other activities and actions, memories of his
little boy, games played, walks taken, and so on. These, to answer her
question, are how he lived. She makes
a final request to the pathologist: to sew her into her husband’s body. She
removes her clothes and steps into the body cavity beside the chimpanzee, curling herself
around it and the teddy bear—the heart of his life (he called his son “my little bear.”) The ape within Rafael may
represent the essential life force we all share, the unconscious or perhaps undirected will to live.)
Albrecht Dürer's Rhinoceros 1515 |
“Home”,
the final chapter, I have discussed earlier and the gist of the novel is clear.
From the past to the present, from despair to hope, from a deadness of the soul
to a living life, the generations-long stories woven through the lives of Tomás
and Doctor Lozora and Peter, and the novel's other characters are displayed as along a path that moves from darkness
to light, from loneliness to love. Martel links each time period through family
ties, traditions and legends, oral history, a journal, records, and I have only the mild criticism that
the storyline is a bit too neatly tied up. Otherwise, it is a satisfying read.
But the “Home” chapter brings to fruition the struggles of all three main characters as they try to understand how to live their lives. What Peter, in the end, realizes is that when you truly come to accept the “other”—in this case the other in Peter’s life is Odo the chimpanzee—even where there is an element of danger (Odo is a wild animal after all, with considerable strength), and further, where there is always at the heart of the other a mystery we can never fully understand, that by allowing the other to be wholly and completely themselves, we can be wholly and completely ourselves.
But the “Home” chapter brings to fruition the struggles of all three main characters as they try to understand how to live their lives. What Peter, in the end, realizes is that when you truly come to accept the “other”—in this case the other in Peter’s life is Odo the chimpanzee—even where there is an element of danger (Odo is a wild animal after all, with considerable strength), and further, where there is always at the heart of the other a mystery we can never fully understand, that by allowing the other to be wholly and completely themselves, we can be wholly and completely ourselves.
I
won’t detail how the various story lines intersect, or go into the religious themes
that run throughout, other than to mention it is an interesting synthesis of two 'opposites' as it were: In
the village church there is the cross with the ape-like Christ above the altar and at the
back of the church there is a shrine to the “Golden Boy” (Marie and Rafael’s
much beloved and remembered son who, over the years, has become a religious
icon for the villagers, and who they also refer to as "a fallen angel".) What is the relevance of both having a place within the same church?
A
final note: Peter, having lived nearly three years in Tuizelo with Odo, who has
become accepted and even loved by many in the village, one day goes for a walk with his
chimpanzee companion. I should note that Martel portrays Odo as Odo—he isn’t a cute talking, magical
chimp; he isn’t telepathic; he is simply who he is, and it’s up to Peter to
understand him, not the other way around. He will never, truly understand Odo. He remains mysterious and alluring, and if I may say, he remains a divine question.
The two go upland and encounter one of the many large boulders in the area. Odo encourages Peter to climb on top of the rock. (And Martel, here, may be suggesting a variation on the story of Saint Peter. This Peter, however, is on top of the rock; he is not the rock as in Jesus's speech: "And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church." Is the role of our Peter to 'found' some sort of new religion or new sensibility? Or is his role more to bear witness to it's birth?)
The two go upland and encounter one of the many large boulders in the area. Odo encourages Peter to climb on top of the rock. (And Martel, here, may be suggesting a variation on the story of Saint Peter. This Peter, however, is on top of the rock; he is not the rock as in Jesus's speech: "And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church." Is the role of our Peter to 'found' some sort of new religion or new sensibility? Or is his role more to bear witness to it's birth?)
Here in this scene, Martel again uses magical realism: The
first two chapters make references to the extinct “Portuguese rhinoceros”
that may have survived as remnants in Portugal up to the Middle Ages. (26, 185) Peter and Odo peer down from their perch on the boulder and watch as one of the supposedly
‘extinct’ creatures walks by! It’s a magical scene, evoking awe and reverence
for life in general. The novel ends with Peter suffering a heart attack
and dying on the boulder, while Odo moves on into the landscape.
Interesting
read.
Cheers,
Jake
*As
an aside, I’d finished the “Homeward” chapter of the novel the previous night,
and was out for a short walk the next afternoon while I waited for my car to be
serviced. On the sidewalk, I approached a woman from behind carrying a shopping
bag in each hand who appeared to be struggling or having some difficulty
walking. As I reached her, I saw she was elderly and, to my eye, seemed frail,
though her eyes were clear and dark over top of her facemask, the now ubiquitous fashion statement in these days of coronavirus. She was a bit breathless and had difficulty
keeping her balance, so I offered to carry her shopping for her (which I found
to be quite light). She was hesitant for a moment then handed me the bags,
thanking me. We walked up the street and talked for a block or two. We reached a bus stop
where there was a bench. She said she was tired and wanted to rest.
Since my car was at the nearby
shop and would soon be ready, I offered to drive her home, and she accepted my
offer. I returned to the mechanic’s, and then drove my car back, but she had gone.
I drove up the street to see if she had continued her walk, but I couldn’t find
her; I assumed she boarded a bus.
Long story short and the
reason why I’m mentioning this is because of the bit of synchronicity that happened as we walked. In Martel’s story, in the
“Homeward” chapter, the main character is a middle-aged pathologist who
receives a late-night visit from an elderly woman whose husband has died.
Marie Dores Passos Castros had been married “some sixty years” to her recently-deceased
husband. (She’d brought his body along in a suitcase for Doctor Lozora, the
pathologist, to examine—an element of “magical realism” Martel incorporates
into his writing.) The woman I walked [oddly here, I misspelled the word as
“waked”. Ed.] with the next day—Darlene was her name—told me that her husband of sixty-four years had died recently (last year).
I thought it was a bit of a coinkydink
that the fictional character, Marie, I’d read about the previous evening and Darlene
who I met the following afternoon, both spoke of deceased husbands and
marriages lasting six decades. I didn’t get shivers from anyone walking over my
grave, but I think maybe it’s one of those “wake-up calls” we get from time to
time. If only I could remember whether or not I’m still dreaming! Did my alarm
go off? And who is calling me, anyways?!
No comments:
Post a Comment